Digital Storytelling Mashup from Tatiana Piatanova on Vimeo.

Reflection:

According to a popular site WhatIs.com, a mashup is “a Web page or application that integrates complementary elements from two or more sources.” It is different from a remix, which is “made when separate media elements are joined to form a new, different piece of media with an entirely different meaning than the original” (Kreisinger, 2011).  On a personal level, I see the difference between the two as mashup being an aggregation of content without necessarily altering the meaning or creating something that is completely different from the meaning of the original works. Whereas remix is taking pieces of content and creating something entirely different. To simplify, if you take a piece of music and overlay another piece of music over it thus creating a completely new song, that would be a remix. It is akin to a DJ performance. In the case of a mashup, I think more in terms of Storify, a site that lets you aggregate the information from the web without altering the information itself.

For this project, I chose to do a mashup aggregating bits and pieces from popular TedTalks to define my own experience and thought process in this course. I looked at a large number of TedTalks and cut short bits that resonated with me the most using Screencast-o-matic screen recorder. During this process, I made sure that the snippets did not go over few seconds or 10% of the original works for copyright and Fair Use considerations. After I had a fair number of video snippets to define my experience I then constructed a video narrative using YouTube’s video editor. I found this process to be addicting and rewarding. It was almost like putting pieces of a puzzle together to construct a picture on a box which is not unlike the experience I had in this course itself.

As we traveled through the semester, the process of storytelling was revealing itself and morphing into different themes, forms, and shapes with the aid of technology. It was fascinating to make connections between (or ascertain the differences) the traditional modes of storytelling and the digital ones. On one hand, both are narratives, on the other hand, they are completely different in their construct and how we experience them. What digital tools allowed us to do is create a non-linear narrative that is intertwined with the stories of others either through linking within the hypertext or through mashups and remixes. For the first time in history technology also allowed the shift of our stories into 3-d mode through VR. However, the experience of these technology enhanced stories is also becoming too literal as there is a little less room left to the audience imagination. But! The stories themselves becoming more imaginative and travel through different genres like Pokemon (from a cartoon to an app) and Final Fantasy (from a video game into a film).  And that is another shift in paradigm that begs further investigation. Another big question that this course inspired is did the change occur because of technological advances (i.e. the shift is a direct effect of technology) or is it human-initiated adaptation to the extension of our life into a digital realm? It brings to mind the idea of technological determinism and on some level, it is possible that this is just a “chicken or the egg” dilemma. Regardless, as all of these pieces were being put together one thing became clear: being human is being a storyteller and our need to tell stories transcends the means by which the story is constructed.


References:

What is mash-up? – Definition from WhatIs.com. (n.d.). Retrieved July 26, 2017, from http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/mash-up

What is a remix, exactly? (2014, May 02). Retrieved July 26, 2017, from https://elisakreisinger.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/what-is-a-remix-exactly/

Remixes and Mashups
Tagged on:     

3 thoughts on “Remixes and Mashups

  • July 27, 2017 at 3:14 pm
    Permalink

    I enjoyed your mashup, particularly the basic concept of using elements of TED Talks to collect and display your thoughts about storytelling. Your choice of Screencast-o-Matic prompted me to take another look at a tool that I had not used in many years (I’m a ScreenFlow addict) and I was happy to see some significant advances there.

    From a technical standpoint, I have one issue with your final product, and that probably has a lot to do with our ingrained expectations of media. Specifically, there are several instances where your audio track goes silent, and each time it made me think the video was finished or that there was something wrong with my connection. I don’t know if you intended that as a form of emphasis—it’s certainly attention-getting—but I found it distracting and confusing. Because this occurred only accompanying images of Soviet propaganda, I suspect you had something else in mind, but I think some audio—even some ambient noise—would make your mashup flow more smoothly.

    I was intrigued by your conclusion:

    I found this process to be addicting and rewarding. It was almost like putting pieces of a puzzle together to construct a picture on a box which is not unlike the experience I had in this course itself.

    I found myself wanting to know much more about your experience. Why was this a rewarding experience, and especially how does this relate to your experience with the course? Other than some specific instances (e.g., your initial struggles with Aurasma) I don’t suspect that you had any technical difficulties, so I’d guess that your learning experiences had more to do with the underlying process of storytelling and not the how-to of creating the stories. It that the case? What insights into storytelling did you experience?

    Reply
    • July 27, 2017 at 8:06 pm
      Permalink

      Hi Skip,
      you are absolutely right about the silent parts of the movie. It was not intentional but rather is a consequence of the YouTube’s editor limitation. The editor does not let you put a track in a specific place within the movie, only at the start of the movie. And after you create a mashup, it does not let you download the file (weird), otherwise, I would have brought it into iMovie and laid the music over.
      I have added a paragraph about my experience in the class and hope it made it clearer. Let me know if I should expand it more.

      Reply
      • July 28, 2017 at 2:41 am
        Permalink

        Exactly! Thank you for this meaningful addition to your post.

        I’ve never use YouTube’s editor, but your explanation makes sense. It sounds like it’s intended specifically for mashups of existing YouTube media–but still, it’s strange that you can’t download your work. I wonder if one of the ubiquitous YouTube downloaders would work?

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *